Criminal Justice Practice Exam 2025 – The All-In-One Resource for Success!

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Question: 1 / 155

Which principle states that prisoners should not receive services superior to those available to free citizens?

The prison-is-for-punishment principle

The no pay, no play principle

The less-eligibility principle

The correct answer, which points to the less-eligibility principle, is significant in the context of criminal justice and corrections. This principle asserts that the conditions and services provided to prisoners should not exceed those available to individuals who are not incarcerated. The rationale behind this principle is rooted in the belief that incarceration serves as a form of punishment and deterrence, and therefore prisoners should not enjoy benefits that could be perceived as more advantageous than what free citizens experience.

By adhering to the less-eligibility principle, the criminal justice system maintains a framework that emphasizes the consequences of criminal behavior, reinforcing the notion that imprisonment is a punishment that carries with it certain restrictions and deprivations. This principle helps to prevent the perception that prison life is preferable to life outside of prison, which could undermine the deterrent effect of incarceration.

In contrast, the other choices refer to different concepts: the prison-is-for-punishment principle highlights the punitive function of incarceration; the no pay, no play principle pertains to restrictions on benefits based on participation or contribution; and the convict-program principle addresses rehabilitation and vocational programs, but does not encompass the broader idea of equivalence of services to society.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

The convict-program principle

Next

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy